Skip to content
Clinchmark

Head to head

LG C4 OLED evo TV vs Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV

Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV leads 2 to 1 on the 3 rankable specs, but LG C4 OLED evo TV costs $100 less. Most of the 28 attributes tracked here are descriptive rather than numeric.

Catalog as of September 1, 2026

Why, in numbers

  • Panel type: LG C4 lists WOLED evo (LG sheet, 2026-09-02); Samsung QN90D Neo lists Mini-LED QLED (VA) (Samsung sheet, 2026-09-02).
  • Peak brightness (HDR): LG C4 lists ~1,000–1,150 nits HDR (other published figure, not on maker sheet); Samsung QN90D Neo lists ~2,000 nits HDR (other published figure, not on maker sheet).
  • Contrast: LG C4 lists Infinite (per-pixel) (our summary); Samsung QN90D Neo lists Very high (local-dimmed LED, not infinite) (our summary).
  • Local dimming: LG C4 lists Per-pixel (self-emissive) (LG sheet, 2026-09-02); Samsung QN90D Neo lists Quantum Matrix with Mini LED (Samsung sheet, 2026-09-02).
  • Viewing angle: LG C4 lists Excellent (our summary); Samsung QN90D Neo lists Wide (Ultra Viewing Angle) (our summary).

Manufacturer list price, not a live offer. Confirm current pricing before you buy.

LG C4 OLED evo TV
$1,7991 spec win
Swap
Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV
$1,8992 spec wins
Swap

Buying for

Every rankable spec counts once. Pick a lens to score only what matters for your tv.

Straight answer

Overall: 1 to 2

Buy the Samsung QN90D Neo.

  • Leads 2 of 3 rankable overall specs; LG C4 takes 1.
  • Peak brightness (HDR): ~2,000 nits HDR vs ~1,000–1,150 nits HDR
  • Thickness: ~27 mm vs ~45 mm
  • LG C4 is $100 cheaper. Pay the difference only if peak brightness (hdr) matters to you.
1 LG C43 rankable of 28 specsSamsung QN90D Neo 2

Deal-breakers

tick what would make you walk away

  • row

    Static news tickers, game HUDs and desktop use can leave permanent marks over the years.

    Trips:LG C4 · Yes (OLED care suite included)Clear:Samsung QN90D Neo · None (LED)

At a glance

The handful of numbers that decide most purchases in this category.

2 of 3 differ

Panel type

LG

WOLED evo

Samsung

Mini-LED QLED (VA)

Peak brightness (HDR)

LG

~1,000–1,150 nits HDR

Samsung

~2,000 nits HDR

HDMI 2.1 portssame

LG

4

Samsung

4

The 90-Day Owner Regret Check

Documented ergonomic quirks, hardware annoyances, and maintenance realities reported by real owners.

Post-Purchase Truths

LG: What to watch for

  • Software / Apps

    Smart TV interface runs sponsored ads and banner recommendations.

    Like most modern smart TV platforms, the home menu highlights suggested streaming content and sponsored banner placement out of the box.

  • Ergonomics

    Thin integrated TV speakers lack low-end bass punch.

    Ultra-thin modern chassis leave minimal acoustic chamber depth, making a dedicated soundbar or audio system virtually mandatory for movie dialogues.

Samsung: What to watch for

  • Software / Apps

    Smart TV interface runs sponsored ads and banner recommendations.

    Like most modern smart TV platforms, the home menu highlights suggested streaming content and sponsored banner placement out of the box.

  • Ergonomics

    Thin integrated TV speakers lack low-end bass punch.

    Ultra-thin modern chassis leave minimal acoustic chamber depth, making a dedicated soundbar or audio system virtually mandatory for movie dialogues.

Picture

leads 1-0
Picture specifications. Middle column is LG C4 OLED evo TV, right column is Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV.
Panel typeWOLED evoMini-LED QLED (VA)
Screen size65 inches65 inches
Resolution3840 × 2160 (4K)3840 × 2160 (4K)
Native refresh rate120 Hz (up to 144 Hz PC)120 Hz (up to 144 Hz PC)
Peak brightness (HDR)Not on the official sheet~1,000–1,150 nits HDR~2,000 nits HDR (wins this row: higher)
ContrastOur summaryInfinite (per-pixel)Very high (local-dimmed LED, not infinite)
Local dimmingPer-pixel (self-emissive)Quantum Matrix with Mini LED
Viewing angleOur summaryExcellentWide (Ultra Viewing Angle)
Screen finishGlossy with anti-reflective coatingMatte anti-glare
HDR formatsDolby Vision, HDR10, HLGHDR10, HDR10+, HLG (no Dolby Vision)

Processing

3 differences
Processing specifications. Middle column is LG C4 OLED evo TV, right column is Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV.
Processorα9 AI Processor 4K Gen7NQ4 AI Gen2 Processor
Motion handlingOur summaryInstant OLED response timeMotion Xcelerator 144Hz
UpscalingAI Super Upscaling 4K4K AI Upscaling Pro

Gaming

leads 1-0
Gaming specifications. Middle column is LG C4 OLED evo TV, right column is Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV.
HDMI 2.1 ports44
4K 120HzYesYes
VRRYes (G-Sync, FreeSync Premium)Yes (FreeSync Premium Pro)
Auto low latency (ALLM)YesYes
Input lag (4K 120, game mode)Not on the official sheet~5.5 ms (wins this row: lower)~9.5 ms
G-Sync / FreeSyncNVIDIA G-Sync, AMD FreeSyncFreeSync Premium Pro, G-Sync Compatible

Audio

1 differences
Audio specifications. Middle column is LG C4 OLED evo TV, right column is Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV.
Speakers2.2 channel, 40WObject Tracking Sound+, 60W 4.2.2ch
Dolby AtmosYesYes
eARCYesYes

Smart TV

2 differences
Smart TV specifications. Middle column is LG C4 OLED evo TV, right column is Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV.
Operating systemwebOS 24Tizen OS
Voice assistantsThinQ, Alexa, Google AssistantBixby, Alexa

Design

leads 1-0
Design specifications. Middle column is LG C4 OLED evo TV, right column is Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV.
ThicknessNot on the official sheet~45 mm (thickest point)~27 mm (wins this row: lower)
Wall mountVESA 300x200Standard VESA

Ownership

1 differences
Ownership specifications. Middle column is LG C4 OLED evo TV, right column is Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV.
Burn-in riskOur summaryYes (OLED care suite included)None (LED)
Warranty1 year1 year
Most rows are from the official spec sheet. Marked rows are other published figures or our summary, not lab tests we ran.

Which one should you buy

Pick this one if

LG C4 OLED evo TV

Versatile 65-inch 4K OLED TV with α9 AI Processor Gen7 and 144Hz PC gaming support.

  • Perfect blacks and near-infinite contrast
  • 144Hz refresh rate with full HDMI 2.1 bandwidth
  • Great value for high-end OLED performance

What you give up

  • Not as bright as MLA OLEDs or top Mini-LEDs
  • OLED burn-in risk with long static elements

Pick this one if

Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV

Premium 65-inch Mini-LED 4K TV with NQ4 AI Gen2 processor, 144Hz refresh rate, and anti-glare screen.

  • High peak brightness exceeding 2,000 nits for sunlit rooms
  • Four full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports supporting up to 144Hz PC gaming
  • Ultra Viewing Angle layer and matte anti-glare finish

What you give up

  • No Dolby Vision format support
  • Slight blooming around bright subtitles on pitch-black backgrounds

Best for each use

Gaming

Console or PC play: low input lag, 120 Hz, enough HDMI 2.1 ports for every box

Too close to call on gaming from the spec sheets. Only input lag (4k 120, game mode) is rankable here.

  • VRR: Yes vs Yes
  • G-Sync / FreeSync: NVIDIA G-Sync, AMD FreeSync vs FreeSync Premium Pro, G-Sync Compatible

Movies

Dark-room films and HDR streaming: black levels, HDR formats, motion and upscaling

Too close to call on movies from the spec sheets. Only peak brightness (hdr) is rankable here.

  • Contrast: Infinite vs Very high
  • Panel type: WOLED evo vs Mini-LED QLED

Bright rooms

Daytime TV and sports in a sunny room: brightness, glare handling, wide seating

Too close to call on bright rooms from the spec sheets. Only peak brightness (hdr) is rankable here.

  • Screen finish: Glossy with anti-reflective coating vs Matte anti-glare
  • Viewing angle: Excellent vs Wide

Every answer above is scored from published figures. A lens uses only the rows that matter for that use, including marked rows that are not on the official sheet. Switch lenses interactively in the panel above.

Done deciding?

Open the full standalone spec sheet for either device.

Manufacturer pages: LG C4 OLED evo TV · Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV

Common questions

Which is cheaper, the LG C4 or the Samsung QN90D Neo?

LG C4 costs $100 less at list price.

What is the biggest catch with the LG C4 or Samsung QN90D Neo?

LG C4 has this deal-breaker: burn-in risk. Static news tickers, game HUDs and desktop use can leave permanent marks over the years.

Which is better for gaming, the LG C4 or the Samsung QN90D Neo?

Too close to call on gaming from the spec sheets. Only input lag (4k 120, game mode) is rankable here. VRR: Yes vs Yes G-Sync / FreeSync: NVIDIA G-Sync, AMD FreeSync vs FreeSync Premium Pro, G-Sync Compatible

What cannot be compared from spec sheets?

Of the 28 specs tracked here, 25 are descriptive and cannot be ranked on numbers alone. Spec sheets also cannot measure subjective factors like build quality, real-world performance, or comfort.

Other matchups