Head to head
LG C4 OLED evo TV vs Sony A95L OLED TV
They split the 4 rankable specs evenly, so cost decides it: LG C4 OLED evo TV costs $1,700 less.
Catalog as of September 1, 2026
Why, in numbers
Swap
Compare a different tv
TCL QM7 Mini-LED TV$799Hisense U7N Mini-LED TV$799Hisense U8N Mini-LED TV$1,299LG B4 OLED TV$1,299TCL QM8 Mini-LED TV$1,499Samsung S90D OLED TV$1,599Samsung Q90C QLED TV$1,799Sony BRAVIA 7 Mini-LED TV$1,799Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV$1,899Sony BRAVIA 8 OLED TV$1,999LG G3 OLED evo TV$2,199Samsung S95D QD-OLED TV$2,599LG G4 OLED evo TV$2,599Sony BRAVIA 9 Mini-LED TV$3,299Swap
Compare a different tv
TCL QM7 Mini-LED TV$799Hisense U7N Mini-LED TV$799Hisense U8N Mini-LED TV$1,299LG B4 OLED TV$1,299TCL QM8 Mini-LED TV$1,499Samsung S90D OLED TV$1,599Samsung Q90C QLED TV$1,799Sony BRAVIA 7 Mini-LED TV$1,799Samsung QN90D Neo QLED TV$1,899Sony BRAVIA 8 OLED TV$1,999LG G3 OLED evo TV$2,199Samsung S95D QD-OLED TV$2,599LG G4 OLED evo TV$2,599Sony BRAVIA 9 Mini-LED TV$3,299Buying for
Straight answer
Overall: 2 to 2
Tied overall. LG C4 is cheaper.
- The 4 rankable overall specs split 2 to 2.
- Saves $1,700 at list price.
At a glance
The handful of numbers that decide most purchases in this category.
Panel type≠
LG
WOLED evo
Sony
QD-OLED
Peak brightness (HDR)
LG
~1,000–1,150 nits HDR
Sony
~1,000–1,500 nits HDR
HDMI 2.1 ports
LG
4
Sony
2 (of 4 HDMI total)
Living Room Space & Placement Check
Real-world physical measurements for credenza width, soundbar clearance, and wall mounting.
TV Stand & Table Footprint
Standard pedestal or dual-foot support
Dual-position feet at extreme edges (needs 56"+ wide table)
Soundbar Clearance
Standard clearance
Soundbar position raises TV ~3.3 in to clear soundbars
Wall Mount Profile & Depth
Standard VESA wall depth
1.4 in slim profile with cable management covers
The 90-Day Owner Regret Check
Documented ergonomic quirks, hardware annoyances, and maintenance realities reported by real owners.
LG: What to watch for
- Software / Apps
Smart TV interface runs sponsored ads and banner recommendations.
- Ergonomics
Thin integrated TV speakers lack low-end bass punch.
Sony: What to watch for
- Hardware Quirk
Only 2 full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports (one shared with eARC soundbar).
- Ergonomics
Extreme edge feet demand an extra-wide 56"+ media console table.
Picture
leads 1-0| Panel type | WOLED evo | QD-OLED |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 65 inches | 65 inches |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 (4K) | 3840 × 2160 (4K) |
| Native refresh rate | 120 Hz (up to 144 Hz PC) | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness (HDR)Not on the official sheet | ~1,000–1,150 nits HDR | ~1,000–1,500 nits HDR (wins this row: higher) |
| ContrastOur summary | Infinite (per-pixel) | Infinite (per-pixel) |
| Local dimming | Per-pixel (self-emissive) | Per-pixel (self-emissive) |
| Viewing angleOur summary | Excellent | Excellent |
| Screen finish | Glossy with anti-reflective coating | Glossy (no AR coating) |
| HDR formats | Dolby Vision, HDR10, HLG | Dolby Vision, HDR10, HLG (no HDR10+) |
Processing
3 differences| Processor | α9 AI Processor 4K Gen7 | Cognitive Processor XR |
|---|---|---|
| Motion handlingOur summary | Instant OLED response time | XR Motion Clarity; class-leading film cadence |
| Upscaling | AI Super Upscaling 4K | XR 4K upscaling (best of this group) |
Gaming
leads 2-0| HDMI 2.1 ports | 4 (wins this row: higher) | 2 (of 4 HDMI total) |
|---|---|---|
| 4K 120Hz | Yes | Yes (on HDMI 2.1 ports) |
| VRR | Yes (G-Sync, FreeSync Premium) | Yes |
| Auto low latency (ALLM) | Yes | Yes |
| Input lag (4K 120, game mode)Not on the official sheet | ~5.5 ms (wins this row: lower) | ~8–12 ms |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | NVIDIA G-Sync, AMD FreeSync | FreeSync, HDMI VRR |
Audio
1 differences| Speakers | 2.2 channel, 40W | Acoustic Surface Audio+, 2.2 ch 60W |
|---|---|---|
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
| eARC | Yes | Yes |
Smart TV
2 differences| Operating system | webOS 24 | Google TV |
|---|---|---|
| Voice assistants | ThinQ, Alexa, Google Assistant | Google Assistant, Alexa |
Design
leads 1-0| ThicknessNot on the official sheet | ~45 mm (thickest point) | ~34 mm (wins this row: lower) |
|---|---|---|
| Wall mount | VESA 300x200 | VESA; optional BRAVIA CAM |
Ownership
1 differences| Burn-in riskOur summary | Yes (OLED care suite included) | Yes (QD-OLED; pixel shift / panel care) |
|---|---|---|
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Which one should you buy
Pick this one if
LG C4 OLED evo TV
Versatile 65-inch 4K OLED TV with α9 AI Processor Gen7 and 144Hz PC gaming support.
- Perfect blacks and near-infinite contrast
- 144Hz refresh rate with full HDMI 2.1 bandwidth
- Great value for high-end OLED performance
What you give up
- Not as bright as MLA OLEDs or top Mini-LEDs
- OLED burn-in risk with long static elements
Pick this one if
Sony A95L OLED TV
Premium 65-inch QD-OLED with XR Cognitive Processor and Acoustic Surface Audio+.
- Best-in-class processing and upscaling
- QD-OLED color volume
- Acoustic Surface Audio+ (sound from the panel)
What you give up
- Only two HDMI 2.1 ports
- Glossy panel, no anti-reflective coating
- Highest price of the three
Best for each use
Gaming
For gaming, buy the LG C4.
Movies
Too close to call on movies from the spec sheets. Only peak brightness (hdr) is rankable here.
Bright rooms
Too close to call on bright rooms from the spec sheets. Only peak brightness (hdr) is rankable here.
Done deciding?
Open the full standalone spec sheet for either device.
Manufacturer pages: LG C4 OLED evo TV ↗ · Sony A95L OLED TV ↗
Common questions
Which is cheaper, the LG C4 or the Sony A95L?
LG C4 costs $1,700 less at list price.
What is the biggest catch with the LG C4 or Sony A95L?
Sony A95L has this deal-breaker: only two HDMI 2.1 ports. A PS5, an Xbox and a 4K120 PC cannot all connect at full bandwidth, and one port doubles as eARC.
Which is better for gaming, the LG C4 or the Sony A95L?
For gaming, buy the LG C4. Leads 2 of 2 rankable gaming specs. HDMI 2.1 ports: 4 vs 2
What cannot be compared from spec sheets?
Of the 28 specs tracked here, 24 are descriptive and cannot be ranked on numbers alone. Spec sheets also cannot measure subjective factors like build quality, real-world performance, or comfort.