Samsung
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Phones
$1,299List price
Explore this product Your shortlist, side by side
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Find the differences that matter for your next decision.
Google
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Phones
$1,799List price
Explore this product What matters most to you?
Start with all rankable specifications, or focus on a particular use.
Your starting point
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra.
- Leads 10 of 13 rankable overall specs; Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold takes 3.
- Weight: 219 g vs 257 g
How we reached this
We compare the published specifications relevant to your priority. Each rankable specification counts once; your selected requirements can rule a product out. This is a guide to the numbers, not a laboratory performance score.
Capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,650 mAh
It is also $500 cheaper.
The trade-off to know
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: Premium $1,299 starting price
Look at the differences ↓Refine your requirements
Your other devices
What would rule one out?
Side by side
The differences, in detail.
Start with the key specs, then explore as much as you need.
| What you’re comparing | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold |
|---|---|---|
| WeightBody | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 257 g (9.07 oz) |
| SizeDisplay | 6.9 inches | 8.0 inches unfolded (6.3 inches folded) |
| ChipsetPlatform | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (3 nm) | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm, Titan M2 security coprocessor) |
| RAMMemory | 12 GB (16 GB option) | 16 GB LPDDR5X |
| Max optical zoomRear camera | 5x optical zoom (10x optical quality, 100x Space Zoom) | 5x optical zoom (up to 20x Super Res Zoom) |
Showing 5 of 48 specifications. Missing values stay unlisted. About the sources
Both sides of the decision
What you gain. What you give up.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Reasons to choose it
- Top-tier Snapdragon 8 Elite 3nm custom Galaxy performance
- Upgraded 50MP ultra-wide and dual 50MP telephoto sensors with 200MP main
- Corning Gorilla Armor 2 anti-reflective display and built-in S Pen stylus
Worth considering
- Premium $1,299 starting price
- Wired charging remains at 45W
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Reasons to choose it
- Huge 8.0-inch Super Actua Flex folding screen (brightest on any foldable up to 2,700 nits)
- Ultra-thin 10.5mm folded profile with fluid gearless hinge
- 7 full years of Android OS and security Feature Drops with 16GB RAM standard
Worth considering
- Cameras use smaller sensors than traditional Pixel 9 Pro to fit the thin chassis
- 21W wired charging is slower than competitors
Beyond the spec sheet
Living with your choice.
Explore the ownership details available for this pair.
Everyday ownership notes
Documented ergonomic quirks, hardware annoyances, and maintenance realities reported by real owners.
Samsung: What to watch for
- Hidden Cost
No wall charging adapter included in the retail box.
Google: What to watch for
- Hidden Cost
No wall charging adapter included in the retail box.
Know what’s behind the comparison
Published specs. Visible sources.
Clinchmark compares manufacturer specifications and other published information. We have not independently lab-tested these products. Editorial assessments and unknown values are identified in the specification details.
Catalog snapshot: September 1, 2026. Prices, availability, and provider terms can change.
Still weighing it up?
Which is cheaper, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold?
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra costs $500 less at list price.
What is the biggest catch with the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold?
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has this deal-breaker: no stylus. No pen input for handwritten notes or markup.
Which is better for photos, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold?
For photos, buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. Leads 4 of 4 rankable photos specs. Main: 200 MP vs 48 MP Quad PD
What cannot be compared from spec sheets?
Of the 48 specs tracked here, 35 are descriptive and cannot be ranked on numbers alone. Spec sheets also cannot measure subjective factors like build quality, real-world performance, or comfort.