Samsung
Samsung Galaxy S24
Phones
$799List price
Explore this product Your shortlist, side by side
Samsung Galaxy S24 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Find the differences that matter for your next decision.
Google
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Phones
$1,799List price
Explore this product What matters most to you?
Start with all rankable specifications, or focus on a particular use.
Your starting point
Buy the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold.
- Leads 8 of 14 rankable overall specs; Samsung Galaxy S24 takes 6.
- Size: 8.0 inches unfolded vs 6.2 inches
How we reached this
We compare the published specifications relevant to your priority. Each rankable specification counts once; your selected requirements can rule a product out. This is a guide to the numbers, not a laboratory performance score.
RAM: 16 GB LPDDR5X vs 8 GB
Samsung Galaxy S24 is $1,000 cheaper. Pay the difference only if size matters to you.
The trade-off to know
Check first: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is not IP68. Tick them under deal-breakers if that rules it out.
Look at the differences ↓Refine your requirements
Your other devices
What would rule one out?
Side by side
The differences, in detail.
Start with the key specs, then explore as much as you need.
| What you’re comparing | Samsung Galaxy S24 | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold |
|---|---|---|
| WeightBody | 167 g | 257 g (9.07 oz) |
| SizeDisplay | 6.2 inches | 8.0 inches unfolded (6.3 inches folded) |
| ChipsetPlatform | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (4 nm) | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm, Titan M2 security coprocessor) |
| RAMMemory | 8 GB | 16 GB LPDDR5X |
| Max optical zoomRear camera | 3x optical (30x digital Space Zoom) | 5x optical zoom (up to 20x Super Res Zoom) |
Showing 5 of 48 specifications. Missing values stay unlisted. About the sources
Both sides of the decision
What you gain. What you give up.
Samsung Galaxy S24
Reasons to choose it
- Extremely lightweight and compact 167g pocket-friendly design
- Dedicated 3x optical telephoto camera on a base model
- Bright 2,600 nit 1-120Hz LTPO display
Worth considering
- Charging capped at 25W wired
- Base model starts with 128GB UFS 3.1 storage
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Reasons to choose it
- Huge 8.0-inch Super Actua Flex folding screen (brightest on any foldable up to 2,700 nits)
- Ultra-thin 10.5mm folded profile with fluid gearless hinge
- 7 full years of Android OS and security Feature Drops with 16GB RAM standard
Worth considering
- Cameras use smaller sensors than traditional Pixel 9 Pro to fit the thin chassis
- 21W wired charging is slower than competitors
Beyond the spec sheet
Living with your choice.
Explore the ownership details available for this pair.
What three years could cost
Samsung Galaxy S24
3-Year Estimated Total$824
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
3-Year Estimated Total$1,799
Everyday ownership notes
Documented ergonomic quirks, hardware annoyances, and maintenance realities reported by real owners.
Samsung: What to watch for
- Hidden Cost
No wall charging adapter included in the retail box.
Google: What to watch for
- Hidden Cost
No wall charging adapter included in the retail box.
Know what’s behind the comparison
Published specs. Visible sources.
Clinchmark compares manufacturer specifications and other published information. We have not independently lab-tested these products. Editorial assessments and unknown values are identified in the specification details.
Catalog snapshot: September 1, 2026. Prices, availability, and provider terms can change.
Still weighing it up?
Which is cheaper, the Samsung Galaxy S24 or the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold?
Samsung Galaxy S24 costs $1,000 less at list price.
What is the biggest catch with the Samsung Galaxy S24 or Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold?
Both has this deal-breaker: no stylus. No pen input for handwritten notes or markup.
Which is better for photos, the Samsung Galaxy S24 or the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold?
For photos, buy the Samsung Galaxy S24. Leads 3 of 5 rankable photos specs; Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold takes 2. Main: 50 MP, f/1.8, 24 mm, 1/1.56", Dual Pixel… vs 48 MP Quad PD
What cannot be compared from spec sheets?
Of the 48 specs tracked here, 34 are descriptive and cannot be ranked on numbers alone. Spec sheets also cannot measure subjective factors like build quality, real-world performance, or comfort.